SkillDevelopment & Engineering
Trace a request through a codebase
Follow one request from entry point to storage or external boundary with concrete file references.
✳Claude Code
By Dave AIDave AI original
MIT · FreeView skill
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
--- name: conductor-validator description: 'Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context. ' risk: safe source: community date_added: '2026-02-27' --- # Validate Conductor workflow artifacts ## When to Use Inspect a project that actually uses a `conductor/` workflow directory after setup, before resuming a track, or when diagnosing inconsistent plans/status. This is distinct from the Rails Conductor desktop-app setup (`conductor.json`/`script/server`). ## Read-only discovery ```bash # Run from the explicitly selected project root; missing paths are findings, not permission to create them. ls -ld conductor/ conductor/tracks/ ls conductor/index.md conductor/product.md conductor/tech-stack.md conductor/workflow.md conductor/tracks.md ``` ## Validation procedure 1. Read current project instructions and the actual configured Conductor workflow/version. 2. Compare the declared artifact list with the project’s real files; report missing, unreadable and extra artifacts separately. 3. Resolve local index/track links, track IDs and plan/status markers against their referenced content. Do not assume directory presence proves completeness. 4. Reconcile completed markers with recorded implementation/test evidence and the current revision; report stale or conflicting state without inventing a pass. 5. Output a concise list of file, observed inconsistency, expected contract and proposed correction. Apply fixes only when requested; preserve existing plans and dirty work. No implementation-playbook file or runnable validator script is bundled. The procedure above is the complete local guide; optional project-specific automation must actually exist and be reviewed before execution. ## Pattern Matching **Status markers in tracks.md:** ``` - [ ] Track Name # Not started - [~] Track Name # In progress - [x] Track Name # Complete ``` **Task markers in plan.md:** ``` - [ ] Task description # Pending - [~] Task description # In progress - [x] Task description # Complete ``` **Track ID pattern:** ``` <type>_<name>_<YYYYMMDD> Example: feature_user_auth_20250115 ``` ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.--- name: conductor-validator description: 'Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context. ' risk: safe source: community date_added: '2026-02-27' --- # Validate Conductor workflow artifacts ## When to Use Inspect a project that actually uses a `conductor/` workflow directory after setup, before resuming a track, or when diagnosing inconsistent plans/status. This is distinct from the Rails Conductor desktop-app setup (`conductor.json`/`script/server`). ## Read-only discovery ```bash # Run from the explicitly selected project root; missing paths are findings, not permission to create them. ls -ld conductor/ conductor/tracks/ ls conductor/index.md conductor/product.md conductor/tech-stack.md conductor/workflow.md conductor/tracks.md ``` ## Validation procedure 1. Read current project instructions and the actual configured Conductor workflow/version. 2. Compare the declared artifact list with the project’s real files; report missing, unreadable and extra artifacts separately. 3. Resolve local index/track links, track IDs and plan/status markers against their referenced content. Do not assume directory presence proves completeness. 4. Reconcile completed markers with recorded implementation/test evidence and the current revision; report stale or conflicting state without inventing a pass. 5. Output a concise list of file, observed inconsistency, expected contract and proposed correction. Apply fixes only when requested; preserve existing plans and dirty work. No implementation-playbook file or runnable validator script is bundled. The procedure above is the complete local guide; optional project-specific automation must actually exist and be reviewed before execution. ## Pattern Matching **Status markers in tracks.md:** ``` - [ ] Track Name # Not started - [~] Track Name # In progress - [x] Track Name # Complete ``` **Task markers in plan.md:** ``` - [ ] Task description # Pending - [~] Task description # In progress - [x] Task description # Complete ``` **Track ID pattern:** ``` <type>_<name>_<YYYYMMDD> Example: feature_user_auth_20250115 ``` ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Imported SKILL.md format for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor. Review the complete instructions and required tools before use. Package integrity checked; individual agent behavior has not been tested.