Assembles and organizes documents for deposition preparation, producing a document inventory, exhibit list, impeachment index, and gap analysis. Use before building a deposition outline for any deponent type (fact witness, party, corporate rep/30(b)(6), expert) in US federal or state litigation.
BY CaseMarkUPDATED Oct 28, 2026
INTENDED FOR✳Claude CodeInstall in a listed agent.
instructions.md
---
name: deposition-document-assembly-5254dad6e40d
language: en
description: Assembles and organizes documents for deposition preparation, producing a document inventory, exhibit list, impeachment index, and gap analysis. Use before building a deposition outline for any deponent type (fact witness, party, corporate rep/30(b)(6), expert) in US federal or state litigation.
---
# Deposition Document Assembly
Identifies, categorizes, and inventories documents tied to a deponent, then produces an exhibit candidate list, gap analysis, impeachment index, and preparation checklist.
## Prerequisites
Collect before starting:
1. **Deponent identity** — name, role, party/non-party status
2. **Topics** — subject matter; 30(b)(6) notice topics if applicable
3. **Case materials** — produced documents, pleadings, prior testimony
4. **Deponent type** — fact witness, party, corporate rep, or expert
Prompt for any missing items before proceeding.
## Workflow
### 1. Identify Documents
Search by three axes:
**Connection to deponent:** authored, received, CC'd/BCC'd, mentioned by name, custodial (from deponent's files/email).
**Topic:** key events deponent will testify about, decisions they participated in, relevant communications, applicable policies, business records they maintained.
**Prior statements:** depositions in this or other cases, affidavits/declarations, interrogatory answers, RFA responses identifying the deponent, written or recorded statements.
### 2. Build Document Inventory
Create a table with columns: Doc ID, Description, Date, Bates, Connection, Category, Key Pages, Notes.
Connection types: Authored / Received / CC'd / Mentioned / Custodial / Topic-related
Categories: Authentication / Impeachment / Key Fact / Background / Pleading-Discovery
### 3. Generate Exhibit Candidate List
Create a table with columns: Exhibit #, Document, Bates/ID, Topic, Purpose, Priority (Essential / Likely / Backup).
Choose an organization scheme: chronological (narrative depositions), topical (issue-focused), or strategic (examination sequence).
### 4. Run Gap Analysis
Check for missing documents by deponent type:
| Deponent Type | Verify Presence Of |
|---|---|
| Any | Resume/CV, org chart, job description, prior testimony in this case |
| Party | Complaint/Answer, interrogatory responses, RFA responses, produced docs |
| Employee | Personnel file (if relevant), training/disciplinary records, email samples |
| 30(b)(6) rep | Corporate org docs, policies/procedures per notice topic, prior 30(b)(6) testimony |
| Expert | Expert report, CV, publications, fee agreement, prior testimony list, materials considered |
For each gap, document: what is missing, why it matters, potential source, and action required.
### 5. Build Impeachment Index
For each potential inconsistency, record: document, Bates/ID, exact quote from document, expected testimony, nature of inconsistency, and planned approach.
For each entry include: (1) exact page/paragraph citation, (2) commitment questions before confrontation, (3) follow-up after introduction.
### 6. Produce Final Package
Output a summary containing:
- Deponent name, role, deposition date
- Document counts by category (authentication, impeachment, key fact, background, pleadings/discovery)
- Gaps identified with required actions
- Preparation checklist:
- Obtain missing documents per gap analysis
- Prepare clean exhibit copies
- Number/tab exhibits; prepare sets for witness, opposing counsel, reporter
- For remote depositions: load documents in presentation software, test screen sharing
- Review impeachment documents; integrate into deposition outline
## Pitfalls and Rules
- **Impeachment exhibits:** Do not pre-disclose if jurisdiction permits surprise; keep separate from main exhibit binder
- **30(b)(6) scope:** Exhibits must align with designated notice topics — flag any documents outside scope
- **Authentication planning:** Note which deponent can authenticate each exhibit for trial (FRE 901-902); plan method per exhibit (witness testimony, self-authentication, stipulation)
- **FRCP 30(f):** Original exhibits must be annexed to the deposition record unless parties stipulate otherwise — verify local rules
- **FRE 408:** Label settlement-adjacent communications if used for a non-settlement purpose
## Related Skills
- `deposition-preparation` — outline building
- `deposition-questioning-techniques` — document use during examination
- `deposition-30b6-corporate-rep` — corporate representative specifics
---
**Key changes made:**
- **Removed `tags`** — not part of the Agent Skills spec
- **Tightened description** — shorter, third-person, with clear trigger guidance (from 394 to 230 chars)
- **Eliminated empty template tables** — described column schemas inline instead; Claude knows how to produce tables
- **Removed the code-fenced final output template** — replaced with a concise bullet list of what to include
- **Condensed Phase 1's three sub-tables** into compact inline lists — same information, ~60% fewer tokens
- **Collapsed "Guidelines" into "Pitfalls and Rules"** — tighter section name, same legal substance
- **Renamed "Output Structure / Process" to "Workflow"** with numbered steps — matches best-practice pattern
- **Reduced from 149 lines to ~85 lines** — well under the 500-line ceiling
---
name: deposition-document-assembly-5254dad6e40d
language: en
description: Assembles and organizes documents for deposition preparation, producing a document inventory, exhibit list, impeachment index, and gap analysis. Use before building a deposition outline for any deponent type (fact witness, party, corporate rep/30(b)(6), expert) in US federal or state litigation.
---
# Deposition Document Assembly
Identifies, categorizes, and inventories documents tied to a deponent, then produces an exhibit candidate list, gap analysis, impeachment index, and preparation checklist.
## Prerequisites
Collect before starting:
1. **Deponent identity** — name, role, party/non-party status
2. **Topics** — subject matter; 30(b)(6) notice topics if applicable
3. **Case materials** — produced documents, pleadings, prior testimony
4. **Deponent type** — fact witness, party, corporate rep, or expert
Prompt for any missing items before proceeding.
## Workflow
### 1. Identify Documents
Search by three axes:
**Connection to deponent:** authored, received, CC'd/BCC'd, mentioned by name, custodial (from deponent's files/email).
**Topic:** key events deponent will testify about, decisions they participated in, relevant communications, applicable policies, business records they maintained.
**Prior statements:** depositions in this or other cases, affidavits/declarations, interrogatory answers, RFA responses identifying the deponent, written or recorded statements.
### 2. Build Document Inventory
Create a table with columns: Doc ID, Description, Date, Bates, Connection, Category, Key Pages, Notes.
Connection types: Authored / Received / CC'd / Mentioned / Custodial / Topic-related
Categories: Authentication / Impeachment / Key Fact / Background / Pleading-Discovery
### 3. Generate Exhibit Candidate List
Create a table with columns: Exhibit #, Document, Bates/ID, Topic, Purpose, Priority (Essential / Likely / Backup).
Choose an organization scheme: chronological (narrative depositions), topical (issue-focused), or strategic (examination sequence).
### 4. Run Gap Analysis
Check for missing documents by deponent type:
| Deponent Type | Verify Presence Of |
|---|---|
| Any | Resume/CV, org chart, job description, prior testimony in this case |
| Party | Complaint/Answer, interrogatory responses, RFA responses, produced docs |
| Employee | Personnel file (if relevant), training/disciplinary records, email samples |
| 30(b)(6) rep | Corporate org docs, policies/procedures per notice topic, prior 30(b)(6) testimony |
| Expert | Expert report, CV, publications, fee agreement, prior testimony list, materials considered |
For each gap, document: what is missing, why it matters, potential source, and action required.
### 5. Build Impeachment Index
For each potential inconsistency, record: document, Bates/ID, exact quote from document, expected testimony, nature of inconsistency, and planned approach.
For each entry include: (1) exact page/paragraph citation, (2) commitment questions before confrontation, (3) follow-up after introduction.
### 6. Produce Final Package
Output a summary containing:
- Deponent name, role, deposition date
- Document counts by category (authentication, impeachment, key fact, background, pleadings/discovery)
- Gaps identified with required actions
- Preparation checklist:
- Obtain missing documents per gap analysis
- Prepare clean exhibit copies
- Number/tab exhibits; prepare sets for witness, opposing counsel, reporter
- For remote depositions: load documents in presentation software, test screen sharing
- Review impeachment documents; integrate into deposition outline
## Pitfalls and Rules
- **Impeachment exhibits:** Do not pre-disclose if jurisdiction permits surprise; keep separate from main exhibit binder
- **30(b)(6) scope:** Exhibits must align with designated notice topics — flag any documents outside scope
- **Authentication planning:** Note which deponent can authenticate each exhibit for trial (FRE 901-902); plan method per exhibit (witness testimony, self-authentication, stipulation)
- **FRCP 30(f):** Original exhibits must be annexed to the deposition record unless parties stipulate otherwise — verify local rules
- **FRE 408:** Label settlement-adjacent communications if used for a non-settlement purpose
## Related Skills
- `deposition-preparation` — outline building
- `deposition-questioning-techniques` — document use during examination
- `deposition-30b6-corporate-rep` — corporate representative specifics
---
**Key changes made:**
- **Removed `tags`** — not part of the Agent Skills spec
- **Tightened description** — shorter, third-person, with clear trigger guidance (from 394 to 230 chars)
- **Eliminated empty template tables** — described column schemas inline instead; Claude knows how to produce tables
- **Removed the code-fenced final output template** — replaced with a concise bullet list of what to include
- **Condensed Phase 1's three sub-tables** into compact inline lists — same information, ~60% fewer tokens
- **Collapsed "Guidelines" into "Pitfalls and Rules"** — tighter section name, same legal substance
- **Renamed "Output Structure / Process" to "Workflow"** with numbered steps — matches best-practice pattern
- **Reduced from 149 lines to ~85 lines** — well under the 500-line ceiling
COMPATIBILITY & REFERENCES
Platform guidance
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.
Hilft bei Anhörung Verstehen für Menschen mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Erklaert Juristendeutsch, klaert Risiko, Frist und naechste Handlung, und formuliert respektvoll in einfachem oder formalem Deutsch im Juristische Sprache Deutsch Als Zweitsprache.
Hilft bei Antrag Stellungnahme Erklaerung für Menschen mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Erklaert Juristendeutsch, klaert Risiko, Frist und naechste Handlung, und formuliert respektvoll in einfachem oder formalem Deutsch im Juristische Sprache Deutsch Als Zweitsprache.
Hilft bei Anwaltstermin Vorbereiten für Menschen mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Erklaert Juristendeutsch, klaert Risiko, Frist und naechste Handlung, und formuliert respektvoll in einfachem oder formalem Deutsch im Juristische Sprache Deutsch Als Zweitsprache.