Generates a structured evidence and liability summary for plaintiff-side personal injury negligence claims. Triggers when the user needs liability analysis, negligence element breakdowns, evidence cataloging with gap identification, discovery assessment, or pre-trial case evaluation.
--- name: evidence-liability-summary-de1b03a76d7a language: en description: Generates a structured evidence and liability summary for plaintiff-side personal injury negligence claims. Triggers when the user needs liability analysis, negligence element breakdowns, evidence cataloging with gap identification, discovery assessment, or pre-trial case evaluation. tags: - analysis - litigation - summarization - summary --- # Evidence & Liability Summary Synthesizes collected evidence into a structured negligence liability analysis (duty, breach, causation, damages) for plaintiff-side personal injury litigation. ## Prerequisites Gather before starting: - **Incident facts** — date, time, location, parties, basic chronology - **Evidence collected** — documents, witness statements, photos/video, medical records, digital evidence - **Medical records** — treatment history, bills, prognosis, expert reports if available - **Jurisdiction** — governing state/federal law - **Defendant info** — identity, relationship to plaintiff, applicable standard of care ## Workflow Mark the output **PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT**. ### Step 1 — Case Overview | Element | Content | |---|---| | Parties | All parties by legal designation (plaintiff, defendant, third parties) | | Incident | Date, time, location, circumstances | | Chronology | Pre-incident through aftermath timeline | | Gaps | Timeline gaps or inconsistencies needing investigation | Write for a lawyer unfamiliar with the matter. ### Step 2 — Evidence Catalog For each item, record: | Field | Description | |---|---| | Exhibit # | Unique identifier | | Category | Documentary / Testimonial / Physical / Digital | | Date | Creation or collection date | | Source | Custodian or origin | | Description | Brief content summary | | Relevance | High / Medium / Low probative value | | Issues | Privilege, hearsay, authentication, admissibility concerns | Flag chain-of-custody gaps, authentication needs, compelling evidence, and discovery gaps. ### Step 3 — Negligence Element Analysis #### A. Duty of Care - **Source**: statute, regulation, professional standard, common law, special relationship - **Standard**: reasonable person, industry standard, professional code — cite authority - **Defense anticipation**: expected denial of duty with counter-analysis #### B. Breach of Duty - Identify specific acts/omissions constituting breach - Map each to supporting evidence by exhibit # - Compare conduct against applicable standard - Reference expert testimony where technical knowledge required - Address anticipated defenses (industry compliance, regulatory adherence) #### C. Causation | Type | Test | Analysis | |---|---|---| | Actual (cause-in-fact) | "But for" test | Address alternative causes; show substantial factor | | Proximate (legal cause) | Foreseeability | Address superseding/intervening causes | | Multiple parties | Comparative fault / joint & several | Apportion under governing law if applicable | #### D. Damages | Category | Items | |---|---| | **Economic** | Past/future medical expenses, lost wages, lost earning capacity, property damage | | **Non-economic** | Pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of consortium | | **Total** | Low–high range | - Support amounts with bills, employment records, estimates, expert testimony - Include present-value calculations for future damages - Address mitigation and pre-existing conditions ### Step 4 — Conclusions & Recommendations Rate each element: | Element | Strength (Strong / Moderate / Weak) | Key Risk | |---|---|---| | Duty | | | | Breach | | | | Causation | | | | Damages | | | Then provide: - Case valuation range with comparable verdict/settlement basis - Discovery gaps and recommended next steps - Expert witnesses to retain - Settlement target range and strategy - Motion practice opportunities - Statute of limitations status and procedural deadlines - Risk assessment — recommend proceed / settle / ADR ### Step 5 — References - Legal authorities in Bluebook format - Evidence cross-reference table (exhibit #, description, file location) - Expert reports (name, credentials, date, key opinions) ## Pitfalls & Checks - Every factual assertion must trace to a specific exhibit — no unsupported conclusions - Use `[VERIFY]` for any citation not confirmed against primary sources - Address jurisdiction-specific negligence standards (comparative vs. contributory) - Acknowledge weaknesses candidly — plaintiff-side framing must still be honest about defense arguments - Consider ethical obligations regarding candor in merit evaluation--- name: evidence-liability-summary-de1b03a76d7a language: en description: Generates a structured evidence and liability summary for plaintiff-side personal injury negligence claims. Triggers when the user needs liability analysis, negligence element breakdowns, evidence cataloging with gap identification, discovery assessment, or pre-trial case evaluation. tags: - analysis - litigation - summarization - summary --- # Evidence & Liability Summary Synthesizes collected evidence into a structured negligence liability analysis (duty, breach, causation, damages) for plaintiff-side personal injury litigation. ## Prerequisites Gather before starting: - **Incident facts** — date, time, location, parties, basic chronology - **Evidence collected** — documents, witness statements, photos/video, medical records, digital evidence - **Medical records** — treatment history, bills, prognosis, expert reports if available - **Jurisdiction** — governing state/federal law - **Defendant info** — identity, relationship to plaintiff, applicable standard of care ## Workflow Mark the output **PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT**. ### Step 1 — Case Overview | Element | Content | |---|---| | Parties | All parties by legal designation (plaintiff, defendant, third parties) | | Incident | Date, time, location, circumstances | | Chronology | Pre-incident through aftermath timeline | | Gaps | Timeline gaps or inconsistencies needing investigation | Write for a lawyer unfamiliar with the matter. ### Step 2 — Evidence Catalog For each item, record: | Field | Description | |---|---| | Exhibit # | Unique identifier | | Category | Documentary / Testimonial / Physical / Digital | | Date | Creation or collection date | | Source | Custodian or origin | | Description | Brief content summary | | Relevance | High / Medium / Low probative value | | Issues | Privilege, hearsay, authentication, admissibility concerns | Flag chain-of-custody gaps, authentication needs, compelling evidence, and discovery gaps. ### Step 3 — Negligence Element Analysis #### A. Duty of Care - **Source**: statute, regulation, professional standard, common law, special relationship - **Standard**: reasonable person, industry standard, professional code — cite authority - **Defense anticipation**: expected denial of duty with counter-analysis #### B. Breach of Duty - Identify specific acts/omissions constituting breach - Map each to supporting evidence by exhibit # - Compare conduct against applicable standard - Reference expert testimony where technical knowledge required - Address anticipated defenses (industry compliance, regulatory adherence) #### C. Causation | Type | Test | Analysis | |---|---|---| | Actual (cause-in-fact) | "But for" test | Address alternative causes; show substantial factor | | Proximate (legal cause) | Foreseeability | Address superseding/intervening causes | | Multiple parties | Comparative fault / joint & several | Apportion under governing law if applicable | #### D. Damages | Category | Items | |---|---| | **Economic** | Past/future medical expenses, lost wages, lost earning capacity, property damage | | **Non-economic** | Pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of consortium | | **Total** | Low–high range | - Support amounts with bills, employment records, estimates, expert testimony - Include present-value calculations for future damages - Address mitigation and pre-existing conditions ### Step 4 — Conclusions & Recommendations Rate each element: | Element | Strength (Strong / Moderate / Weak) | Key Risk | |---|---|---| | Duty | | | | Breach | | | | Causation | | | | Damages | | | Then provide: - Case valuation range with comparable verdict/settlement basis - Discovery gaps and recommended next steps - Expert witnesses to retain - Settlement target range and strategy - Motion practice opportunities - Statute of limitations status and procedural deadlines - Risk assessment — recommend proceed / settle / ADR ### Step 5 — References - Legal authorities in Bluebook format - Evidence cross-reference table (exhibit #, description, file location) - Expert reports (name, credentials, date, key opinions) ## Pitfalls & Checks - Every factual assertion must trace to a specific exhibit — no unsupported conclusions - Use `[VERIFY]` for any citation not confirmed against primary sources - Address jurisdiction-specific negligence standards (comparative vs. contributory) - Acknowledge weaknesses candidly — plaintiff-side framing must still be honest about defense arguments - Consider ethical obligations regarding candor in merit evaluation
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.