--- name: to-prd description: Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed. disable-model-invocation: true category: "project-management" risk: "safe" source: "community" source_repo: "mattpocock/skills" source_type: "community" date_added: "2026-06-19" author: "Matt Pocock" license: "MIT" license_source: "https://github.com/mattpocock/skills/blob/main/LICENSE" tags: - project-management - workflow - coding-agents tools: - claude-code - codex-cli - cursor --- ## When to Use Use when this workflow matches the user request: Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed. _Source: [mattpocock/skills](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills) (MIT)._This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know. The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not. ## Process 1. Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the PRD, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching. 2. Sketch out the seams at which you're going to test the feature. Existing seams should be preferred to new ones. Use the highest seam possible. If new seams are needed, propose them at the highest point you can. The fewer seams across the codebase, the better - the ideal number is one. Check with the user that these seams match their expectations. 3. Write the PRD using the template below, then publish it to the project issue tracker. Apply the `ready-for-agent` triage label - no need for additional triage. ## Problem Statement The problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective. ## Solution The solution to the problem, from the user's perspective. ## User Stories A LONG, numbered list of user stories. Each user story should be in the format of: 1. As an , I want a , so that 1. As a mobile bank customer, I want to see balance on my accounts, so that I can make better informed decisions about my spending This list of user stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the feature. ## Implementation Decisions A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include: - The modules that will be built/modified - The interfaces of those modules that will be modified - Technical clarifications from the developer - Architectural decisions - Schema changes - API contracts - Specific interactions Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits. ## Testing Decisions A list of testing decisions that were made. Include: - A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details) - Which modules will be tested - Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase) ## Out of Scope A description of the things that are out of scope for this PRD. ## Further Notes Any further notes about the feature. ## Example **User request:** > Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed. ## Limitations - Requires the upstream tool, account, API key, or local setup when the workflow names one. - Does not authorize destructive, production, paid, or external-message actions without explicit user approval. - Validate generated artifacts or recommendations against the user's real sources before treating them as final. --- Source attribution: mattpocock/skills contributors, via Agentic Awesome Skills Original project: https://github.com/mattpocock/skills License: MIT + CC-BY-4.0 License information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Original upstream instructions; downloaded from Dave AI. ## Upstream license notice MIT License Copyright (c) 2026 Matt Pocock Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. # Dave AI resource metadata Creator / publisher: mattpocock/skills contributors, via Agentic Awesome Skills Original project: https://github.com/mattpocock/skills Attribution basis: Recorded upstream repository Fields of work: Product Management Roles: Product Manager Specialties: Specialty not specified Tools: Tool not specified Country applicability: Country not specified Classification basis: Dave AI task classification from package title, description, and declared metadata Instruction SHA-256: 91a53f03fa89f382fe1708ed9065e8944b3d51324ebf5b3cfc075b0fda76122a Metadata reviewed: 2026-10-27 This metadata supersedes earlier Dave AI catalog attribution. Original instruction and supporting files are preserved.