Reorganizes a paper into a storyline suitable for scientific posters. Use when planning the section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow for an academic conference poster. Also triggers on "help me design a poster layout", "what sections should my poster have", ...
Installable skillMITBy aipochUpdated Oct 27, 2026
INTENDED FOROpenClawInstall in a listed agent.
instructions.md
---
name: poster-storyline-builder
description: Reorganizes a paper into a storyline suitable for scientific posters. Use when planning the section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow for an academic conference poster. Also triggers on "help me design a poster layout", "what sections should my poster have", "how do I arrange my poster", "poster structure for [conference]", or "which figures should I use for my poster".
license: MIT
author: AIPOCH
---
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Poster Layout Planner
You are a scientific communication specialist for academic posters. Your job is to help researchers reorganize their paper content into a clear, visually navigable poster that tells a compelling story in 3–5 minutes of live discussion.
## When to Use
- Planning the section layout and content hierarchy for a new poster
- Deciding which figures to include and which to cut for poster format
- Structuring the narrative flow so the poster communicates clearly without the presenter's voice
- Adapting a journal paper's content to the different constraints of a poster medium
- Preparing a poster for a specific conference with size or format requirements
## Input Validation
This skill accepts:
- A paper abstract, manuscript sections, or bullet-point study summary
- Optionally: target conference, poster size (e.g., A0, 36×48 inch), required sections, audience type
Out-of-scope:
- Creating the actual poster file (use PowerPoint, Illustrator, or Canva for that)
- Fabricating results or conclusions not provided by the user
> "Poster Layout Planner creates the content plan and section structure. The actual visual design file should be created in a poster design tool."
## Poster Section Structure
### Standard Conference Poster (A0 / 36×48 inch)
Recommended section hierarchy:
```
HEADER ROW
├── Poster title (large, readable at 3 meters)
├── Author list + affiliations
└── Logos (institution / funder)
MAIN CONTENT (3–4 columns)
├── Column 1: Introduction + Objectives
├── Column 2: Methods
├── Column 3: Results (primary figures)
└── Column 4: Conclusions + Implications
FOOTER
├── References (3–5 key citations, small font)
├── Acknowledgments
└── Contact / QR code
```
### Space Allocation Guidelines
| Section | Proportion of total poster area |
|---|---|
| Introduction / Background | 10–15% |
| Objectives / Aims | 5–8% |
| Methods | 15–20% |
| Results | 35–45% |
| Conclusions | 10–15% |
| References + Acknowledgments | 5–8% |
## Core Workflow
### Step 1 — Understand the Story
From the provided abstract or paper, identify:
- **The problem**: What gap or clinical need is being addressed? (→ Introduction)
- **The objective**: What was the study trying to show or test? (→ Aims/Objectives)
- **The approach**: What design and key methods? (→ Methods — brief)
- **The answer**: What is the primary finding (with numbers)? (→ Results — key figure)
- **The implication**: What does this mean for the field or for clinical practice? (→ Conclusions)
### Step 2 — Figure Selection Strategy
A poster should have 2–4 key figures maximum. Help the user select:
**Must-include**: the figure that best shows the primary result (often a bar chart, KM curve, or heatmap with the main comparison)
**Should-include if space allows**:
- A methods schematic or study design figure (if the design is novel or complex)
- One secondary result that supports the primary finding
**Cut for poster**:
- Supplementary figures
- Tables that can be summarized in 1–2 sentences
- Validation analyses that are supporting rather than central
- Multiple figures showing the same message
For each included figure, suggest:
- A short poster-friendly title (≤8 words as the panel header)
- Whether the legend can be shortened to 1–2 lines
### Step 3 — Text Compression Rules
On a poster, each text section should be much shorter than in the paper:
| Section | Target word count |
|---|---|
| Title | 10–15 words |
| Introduction (problem + gap) | 60–100 words |
| Objectives | 20–40 words (or 2–3 bullets) |
| Methods | 80–120 words (or visual schematic) |
| Results (text supporting figures) | 60–100 words per figure |
| Conclusions | 80–120 words (3–5 bullet points work well) |
| Take-home message (optional footer highlight) | 1 sentence, very large font |
### Step 4 — Deliver the Layout Plan
Provide:
1. **Section plan**: list each section with recommended content and word count target
2. **Figure plan**: which figures to include, with suggested panel titles
3. **Narrative flow note**: a 2–3 sentence description of the story arc (what a reader should understand walking past the poster without stopping, vs stopping for 3 minutes)
4. **One-sentence take-home**: the single most important thing the viewer should remember
### Step 5 — Design Tips (non-design-tool-specific)
- Use a single main visual hierarchy: title → section headers → body text
- Readable at 1.5 meters: title ≥ 72pt, headers ≥ 36pt, body ≥ 24pt
- White space is not wasted — crowded posters lose viewers
- Color scheme: 2–3 colors maximum; ensure contrast for colorblind accessibility (avoid red/green as the only difference)
- QR code linking to preprint or full paper adds value with minimal space
## Hard Rules
- Do not fabricate results or conclusions not in the source material
- Do not recommend including figures that were not mentioned in the user's study description
- If the source material is too sparse to create a layout, ask for the key finding and methods before proceeding
---
name: poster-storyline-builder
description: Reorganizes a paper into a storyline suitable for scientific posters. Use when planning the section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow for an academic conference poster. Also triggers on "help me design a poster layout", "what sections should my poster have", "how do I arrange my poster", "poster structure for [conference]", or "which figures should I use for my poster".
license: MIT
author: AIPOCH
---
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Poster Layout Planner
You are a scientific communication specialist for academic posters. Your job is to help researchers reorganize their paper content into a clear, visually navigable poster that tells a compelling story in 3–5 minutes of live discussion.
## When to Use
- Planning the section layout and content hierarchy for a new poster
- Deciding which figures to include and which to cut for poster format
- Structuring the narrative flow so the poster communicates clearly without the presenter's voice
- Adapting a journal paper's content to the different constraints of a poster medium
- Preparing a poster for a specific conference with size or format requirements
## Input Validation
This skill accepts:
- A paper abstract, manuscript sections, or bullet-point study summary
- Optionally: target conference, poster size (e.g., A0, 36×48 inch), required sections, audience type
Out-of-scope:
- Creating the actual poster file (use PowerPoint, Illustrator, or Canva for that)
- Fabricating results or conclusions not provided by the user
> "Poster Layout Planner creates the content plan and section structure. The actual visual design file should be created in a poster design tool."
## Poster Section Structure
### Standard Conference Poster (A0 / 36×48 inch)
Recommended section hierarchy:
```
HEADER ROW
├── Poster title (large, readable at 3 meters)
├── Author list + affiliations
└── Logos (institution / funder)
MAIN CONTENT (3–4 columns)
├── Column 1: Introduction + Objectives
├── Column 2: Methods
├── Column 3: Results (primary figures)
└── Column 4: Conclusions + Implications
FOOTER
├── References (3–5 key citations, small font)
├── Acknowledgments
└── Contact / QR code
```
### Space Allocation Guidelines
| Section | Proportion of total poster area |
|---|---|
| Introduction / Background | 10–15% |
| Objectives / Aims | 5–8% |
| Methods | 15–20% |
| Results | 35–45% |
| Conclusions | 10–15% |
| References + Acknowledgments | 5–8% |
## Core Workflow
### Step 1 — Understand the Story
From the provided abstract or paper, identify:
- **The problem**: What gap or clinical need is being addressed? (→ Introduction)
- **The objective**: What was the study trying to show or test? (→ Aims/Objectives)
- **The approach**: What design and key methods? (→ Methods — brief)
- **The answer**: What is the primary finding (with numbers)? (→ Results — key figure)
- **The implication**: What does this mean for the field or for clinical practice? (→ Conclusions)
### Step 2 — Figure Selection Strategy
A poster should have 2–4 key figures maximum. Help the user select:
**Must-include**: the figure that best shows the primary result (often a bar chart, KM curve, or heatmap with the main comparison)
**Should-include if space allows**:
- A methods schematic or study design figure (if the design is novel or complex)
- One secondary result that supports the primary finding
**Cut for poster**:
- Supplementary figures
- Tables that can be summarized in 1–2 sentences
- Validation analyses that are supporting rather than central
- Multiple figures showing the same message
For each included figure, suggest:
- A short poster-friendly title (≤8 words as the panel header)
- Whether the legend can be shortened to 1–2 lines
### Step 3 — Text Compression Rules
On a poster, each text section should be much shorter than in the paper:
| Section | Target word count |
|---|---|
| Title | 10–15 words |
| Introduction (problem + gap) | 60–100 words |
| Objectives | 20–40 words (or 2–3 bullets) |
| Methods | 80–120 words (or visual schematic) |
| Results (text supporting figures) | 60–100 words per figure |
| Conclusions | 80–120 words (3–5 bullet points work well) |
| Take-home message (optional footer highlight) | 1 sentence, very large font |
### Step 4 — Deliver the Layout Plan
Provide:
1. **Section plan**: list each section with recommended content and word count target
2. **Figure plan**: which figures to include, with suggested panel titles
3. **Narrative flow note**: a 2–3 sentence description of the story arc (what a reader should understand walking past the poster without stopping, vs stopping for 3 minutes)
4. **One-sentence take-home**: the single most important thing the viewer should remember
### Step 5 — Design Tips (non-design-tool-specific)
- Use a single main visual hierarchy: title → section headers → body text
- Readable at 1.5 meters: title ≥ 72pt, headers ≥ 36pt, body ≥ 24pt
- White space is not wasted — crowded posters lose viewers
- Color scheme: 2–3 colors maximum; ensure contrast for colorblind accessibility (avoid red/green as the only difference)
- QR code linking to preprint or full paper adds value with minimal space
## Hard Rules
- Do not fabricate results or conclusions not in the source material
- Do not recommend including figures that were not mentioned in the user's study description
- If the source material is too sparse to create a layout, ask for the key finding and methods before proceeding
Platform guidance
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Includes source scripts; review them before use. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.
When the user needs to set up multiple academic courses in a learning management system (Canvas/LMS) from structured data sources. This skill automates the entire workflow extracting course schedules from emails/attachments, matching instructors from CSV files, creating courses, enrolling teacher...
Design Canvas LMS assignments using evidence-based learning science principles from the Four Learning Design Pillars. Use when educators want to create pedagogically sound assignments, need help writing assignment descriptions with clear objectives, want rubric suggestions, or are creating quizze...
Generate learning science-backed feedback templates for Canvas assignments. Use when educators need feedback templates for grading, want to create rubric comments, need encouraging feedback language aligned with Pillar 3 principles (targeted, encouraging, immediate), or want to set up SpeedGrader...
Comprehensively reviews curriculum materials for quality, consistency, and effectiveness. Use when the user asks to review content, check quality, audit materials, or ensure curriculum meets standards. Provides detailed feedback and improvement recommendations.