Generate scientific hypotheses, experimental designs, and paper drafts. Use when: user asks to propose hypotheses, design experiments, or write scientific content. NOT for: data analysis or literature search.
Installable skillMITBy beita6969Updated Oct 27, 2026
INTENDED FOROpenClawInstall in a listed agent.
instructions.md
---
name: scienceclaw-generation
description: "Generate scientific hypotheses, experimental designs, and paper drafts. Use when: user asks to propose hypotheses, design experiments, or write scientific content. NOT for: data analysis or literature search."
metadata: { "openclaw": { "emoji": "💡" } }
---
# Scientific Generation Skill
Generate hypotheses, experimental designs, and scientific writing across all disciplines.
## When to Use
- "Propose hypotheses for this research question"
- "Design an experiment to test..."
- "Draft a methods section for..."
- "Generate research questions for this topic"
- "Write an abstract for these findings"
- Planning new research directions
## When NOT to Use
- Running data analysis (use code-execution + scipy-analysis)
- Literature searching (use literature-search)
- Verifying claims (use scienceclaw-verification)
- Pure information extraction (use scienceclaw-ie)
## Generation Types
### 1. Hypothesis Generation
Follow the structured workflow:
1. **Observation**: State the observed phenomenon or gap
2. **Literature Context**: Reference existing knowledge and gaps
3. **Hypothesis Statement**: Formulate as testable H0/H1
4. **Variables**: Identify independent, dependent, and control variables
5. **Predictions**: State specific, measurable predictions
6. **Falsifiability**: Explain what would disprove the hypothesis
7. **Novelty Assessment**: Rate novelty (incremental/moderate/transformative)
Format: "If [independent variable] then [predicted effect on dependent variable] because [mechanism/rationale]"
### 2. Experimental Design
Include all components:
- **Objective**: Clear research question
- **Design Type**: RCT, factorial, quasi-experimental, etc.
- **Sample**: Size calculation (power analysis), selection criteria, randomization
- **Variables**: IV, DV, controls, confounds
- **Protocol**: Step-by-step procedure
- **Analysis Plan**: Statistical tests, significance thresholds
- **Ethics**: IRB/IACUC considerations
- **Reproducibility Checklist**: Materials, data sharing, pre-registration
### 3. Scientific Writing
Support all IMRaD sections:
- **Introduction**: Background, gap, objective, significance
- **Methods**: Detailed, reproducible protocol
- **Results**: Findings with statistical reporting
- **Discussion**: Interpretation, limitations, implications
- **Abstract**: Structured summary (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions)
### 4. Research Question Generation
From a broad topic, generate:
- Descriptive questions (What/How/When)
- Comparative questions (differences between groups)
- Correlational questions (relationships between variables)
- Causal questions (cause-effect with mechanisms)
## Quality Criteria
All generated content must:
1. Be grounded in existing scientific knowledge
2. Use discipline-appropriate terminology
3. Be specific and testable (for hypotheses)
4. Include feasibility assessment
5. Consider ethical implications
6. Acknowledge limitations and assumptions
7. Cite relevant foundational work when possible
## Citation Format
When referencing prior work in generated content, use:
- Inline: (Author et al., Year) or [DOI]
- Note which citations need verification
- Distinguish confirmed vs. suggested references
---
name: scienceclaw-generation
description: "Generate scientific hypotheses, experimental designs, and paper drafts. Use when: user asks to propose hypotheses, design experiments, or write scientific content. NOT for: data analysis or literature search."
metadata: { "openclaw": { "emoji": "💡" } }
---
# Scientific Generation Skill
Generate hypotheses, experimental designs, and scientific writing across all disciplines.
## When to Use
- "Propose hypotheses for this research question"
- "Design an experiment to test..."
- "Draft a methods section for..."
- "Generate research questions for this topic"
- "Write an abstract for these findings"
- Planning new research directions
## When NOT to Use
- Running data analysis (use code-execution + scipy-analysis)
- Literature searching (use literature-search)
- Verifying claims (use scienceclaw-verification)
- Pure information extraction (use scienceclaw-ie)
## Generation Types
### 1. Hypothesis Generation
Follow the structured workflow:
1. **Observation**: State the observed phenomenon or gap
2. **Literature Context**: Reference existing knowledge and gaps
3. **Hypothesis Statement**: Formulate as testable H0/H1
4. **Variables**: Identify independent, dependent, and control variables
5. **Predictions**: State specific, measurable predictions
6. **Falsifiability**: Explain what would disprove the hypothesis
7. **Novelty Assessment**: Rate novelty (incremental/moderate/transformative)
Format: "If [independent variable] then [predicted effect on dependent variable] because [mechanism/rationale]"
### 2. Experimental Design
Include all components:
- **Objective**: Clear research question
- **Design Type**: RCT, factorial, quasi-experimental, etc.
- **Sample**: Size calculation (power analysis), selection criteria, randomization
- **Variables**: IV, DV, controls, confounds
- **Protocol**: Step-by-step procedure
- **Analysis Plan**: Statistical tests, significance thresholds
- **Ethics**: IRB/IACUC considerations
- **Reproducibility Checklist**: Materials, data sharing, pre-registration
### 3. Scientific Writing
Support all IMRaD sections:
- **Introduction**: Background, gap, objective, significance
- **Methods**: Detailed, reproducible protocol
- **Results**: Findings with statistical reporting
- **Discussion**: Interpretation, limitations, implications
- **Abstract**: Structured summary (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions)
### 4. Research Question Generation
From a broad topic, generate:
- Descriptive questions (What/How/When)
- Comparative questions (differences between groups)
- Correlational questions (relationships between variables)
- Causal questions (cause-effect with mechanisms)
## Quality Criteria
All generated content must:
1. Be grounded in existing scientific knowledge
2. Use discipline-appropriate terminology
3. Be specific and testable (for hypotheses)
4. Include feasibility assessment
5. Consider ethical implications
6. Acknowledge limitations and assumptions
7. Cite relevant foundational work when possible
## Citation Format
When referencing prior work in generated content, use:
- Inline: (Author et al., Year) or [DOI]
- Note which citations need verification
- Distinguish confirmed vs. suggested references
Platform guidance
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.
When the user needs to set up multiple academic courses in a learning management system (Canvas/LMS) from structured data sources. This skill automates the entire workflow extracting course schedules from emails/attachments, matching instructors from CSV files, creating courses, enrolling teacher...
Design Canvas LMS assignments using evidence-based learning science principles from the Four Learning Design Pillars. Use when educators want to create pedagogically sound assignments, need help writing assignment descriptions with clear objectives, want rubric suggestions, or are creating quizze...
Generate learning science-backed feedback templates for Canvas assignments. Use when educators need feedback templates for grading, want to create rubric comments, need encouraging feedback language aligned with Pillar 3 principles (targeted, encouraging, immediate), or want to set up SpeedGrader...
Comprehensively reviews curriculum materials for quality, consistency, and effectiveness. Use when the user asks to review content, check quality, audit materials, or ensure curriculum meets standards. Provides detailed feedback and improvement recommendations.